<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mueller scopes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rifle-scope-guide.com/mueller-scopes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rifle-scope-guide.com/mueller-scopes/</link>
	<description>Informational site about rifle scopes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:13:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: !!SNIPER!!</title>
		<link>http://www.rifle-scope-guide.com/mueller-scopes/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>!!SNIPER!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rifle-scope-guide.com/mueller-scopes/#comment-210</guid>
		<description>I Thinks its a pretty decent scope for the money. I had a difficult time seeing the ultra fine cross hairs but with the illuminated micro dot this would be a perfect varmint scope.especially matched up with the 22/250. The 1/8 in windage and elevation adjustments are great. The only turn off is the LIMITED lifetime warranty. My scopes (Nikkon/Swarovski) have lifetime warranty period. but they are more than double the price of this model.
Id say go for it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Thinks its a pretty decent scope for the money. I had a difficult time seeing the ultra fine cross hairs but with the illuminated micro dot this would be a perfect varmint scope.especially matched up with the 22/250. The 1/8 in windage and elevation adjustments are great. The only turn off is the LIMITED lifetime warranty. My scopes (Nikkon/Swarovski) have lifetime warranty period. but they are more than double the price of this model.<br />
Id say go for it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
